Safe Harbor Statement: Statements in this news delivery might be "forward-looking proclamations". Forward-looking explanations incorporate, however are not restricted to, proclamations that express our aims, convictions, assumptions, methodologies, expectations or some other assertions identifying with our future exercises or other future occasions or conditions. These assertions depend on current assumptions, evaluations and projections about our business based, to a limited extent, on suppositions made by the executives. These assertions are not certifications of future execution and include dangers, vulnerabilities and suspicions that are hard to anticipate. Consequently, real results and results may, and are probably going to, vary substantially based on what is communicated or guage in forward-looking explanations because of various components. Any forward-looking assertions talk just as of the date of this news delivery and iQSTEL Inc. embraces no commitment to refres...
An overlay either can add or remove controls from the required set used to analyze the system security risks. It also can refine controls, adding additional text for clarity. Although systems designers have discussed developing an overlay that makes it easier to apply the RMF to embedded systems, that hasn't happened yet. Still, there is progress in developing overlays specific to weapon systems or mission computers that may apply to embedded systems. For example, Appendix F of CNSSI 1253 references six different overlays, including a space platform overlay. Programs should look to the military services to understand if an overlay that applies to their type of system has already been developed before spending unnecessary time going through all computer science vs software engineering controls and documenting their decisions. Once the systems integrator identifies the appropriate RMF controls he or she needs to determine how to implement them (Step 3 in the RMF Process ...